Case
Junzhiquan Helps Huawei Win the First Victory —A H...
BackBack
Case
Junzhiquan Helps Huawei Win the First Victory —A Huawei v. Samsung Case for Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Infringement
2018.01.15
Guangdong Junzhiquan Law Firm represented Huawei and won the case ((2016) Yue 03 Minchu No. 840) of SEP infringement against Samsung. After one and a half years of trial, the Shenzhen Intellectual Property Court made the first-instance judgment on the Huawei v. Samsung case ((2016) Yue 03 Minchu No. 840) of SEP infringement at 10:30 am on January 11, 2018.
Case No. (2016) Yue 03 Minchu No. 840
Plaintiff Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Defendants Samsung (China) Investment Co., Ltd.
Samsung Electronics Huizhou Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Nanfang Yunhe Technology Co., Ltd.
Patent at Issue No. ZL201010137731.2
" METHOD, BASE STATION, AND USER EQUIPMENT FOR FEEDING BACK ACK/NACK INFORMATION FOR CARRIER AGGREGATION"
Focus of Dispute 1. FRAND issues, dispute over whether Huawei or Samsung is at fault when a license agreement fails to be reached;
2. Identification and determination of the technical facts.
Result of Judgment 1. The Defendants Samsung (China) Investment Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Huizhou Co., Ltd. shall immediately cease the act of infringement upon the Plaintiff's patent No. ZL201010137731.2
by means of manufacturing, selling, offering to sale, or use relevant products;
2. The Defendant Shenzhen Nanfang Yunhe Technology Co., Ltd. shall immediately cease the act of infringement upon the Plaintiff's patent No. ZL 201010137731.2 by means of selling and offering to sale relevant products;
3. Other claims of the Plaintiff are dismissed.
Case Brief The Plaintiff claimed that it has a large number of wireless communication SEPs, and the invention patent No. ZL201010137731.2 involved in this case is a standard essential patent of 4G. The Defendants infringed the patent rights involved in this case by manufacturing, selling, offering tosale, use, or import relevant products without the Plaintiff's permission, and failed to follow the FRAND (Fair, Reasonable, and Non-discriminatory) principle in licensing negotiations, which was obviously at fault. Therefore, the Plaintiff requested a court order to cease the Defendants' act of infringement immediately.
Timeline May 2016 The Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court placed the case on file.
June 2016 Samsung filed a patent invalidation claim
November 2016 The patent invalidation trial was heard.
End of 2016 to beginning of 2017 The Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court held a court session.
May 2017 The Reexamination Board upheld the validity of the patent at issue.
January 11, 2018 The Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court ruled that Samsung must cease the act of infringement immediately.
 
related case
J&Q acts as the litigant agent of Lipu in the case of patent infringement of needle guidess and turns the tide and wins in the second instance
J&Q acts as the litigant agent of Lipu in the case of patent infringement of needle guidess and turns the tide and wins in the second instance
2022.11.16
Junzhiquan agent Huiding "black screen unlock" patent case, the first trial was awarded 40 million
Junzhiquan agent Huiding "black screen unlock" patent case, the first trial was awarded 40 million
Junzhiquan Helps Goodix Win Case of "Black Screen ...
2020.03.05
The first "High Value Patent Service Alliance" was established in Guangzhou
The first "High Value Patent Service Alliance" was established in Guangzhou
2019.11.14
Research on the Jurisdiction of Disputes over Liability for Damages Caused by Initiation of Intellectual Property Lawsuits with Malicious Intent
Research on the Jurisdiction of Disputes over Liability for Damages Caused by Initiation of Intellectual Property Lawsuits with Malicious Intent
2019.06.29
Junzhiquan successfully settled the dispute over necessary patent right (SEP) between Huawei and Samsung
Junzhiquan successfully settled the dispute over necessary patent right (SEP) between Huawei and Samsung
2019.03.04
Good news junzhiquan, acting as the agent of the invalidation case of international art energy trademark, successfully maintains the validity of the t
Good news junzhiquan, acting as the agent of the invalidation case of international art energy trademark, successfully maintains the validity of the t
unzhiquan Helps ComicRitz Win Defense Against Trad...
2019.02.21
Lawyer Jun Zhiquan Liu Jun was invited to give a keynote speech at the Sino German intellectual property exchange
Lawyer Jun Zhiquan Liu Jun was invited to give a keynote speech at the Sino German intellectual property exchange
2018.12.12
深圳市知识产权研究协会会长殷汉范一行参观了君志泉。
深圳市知识产权研究协会会长殷汉范一行参观了君志泉。
2018.10.24
Claim 210 million! Junzhiquan acting as huiding patent infringement case
Claim 210 million! Junzhiquan acting as huiding patent infringement case
2018.10.22
Junzhiquan Helps Netac Win "99 Patent" Case and Get Compensation of RMB 40 million
Junzhiquan Helps Netac Win "99 Patent" Case and Get Compensation of RMB 40 million
Junzhiquan Helps Netac Win "99 Patent" Case and Ge...
2018.08.07
Jun Zhiquan’s electronic evidence was approved by the court, and the utility model patent was awarded 600,000 yuan
Jun Zhiquan’s electronic evidence was approved by the court, and the utility model patent was awarded 600,000 yuan
2018.06.26
Junzhiquan wins the 17th invalidation request for the escort of luco 99 patent
Junzhiquan wins the 17th invalidation request for the escort of luco 99 patent
2018.06.20
Case Represented by Junzhiquan Listed by SPC as a Typical IP Case in 2017
Case Represented by Junzhiquan Listed by SPC as a Typical IP Case in 2017
Case Represented by Junzhiquan Listed by SPC as a ...
2018.04.25
Celeberate! Shenzhen Junzhiquan Inaugurates Beijing Branch
Celeberate! Shenzhen Junzhiquan Inaugurates Beijing Branch
2018.04.17
First instance judgment of Huawei v. Samsung standard essential patent (SEP) infringement case
First instance judgment of Huawei v. Samsung standard essential patent (SEP) infringement case
2018.03.24
The qualification of the subject applying for a patent invalidation on the ground of a conflict with the legal rights obtained earlier by others shall
The qualification of the subject applying for a patent invalidation on the ground of a conflict with the legal rights obtained earlier by others shall
2018.03.23